PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has outperformed FAAR with an annualized return of 5.65%, while FAAR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
0.92%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.32%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
5.65%

FAAR

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
22.65%
6M
22.23%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
12.51%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
22.65%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-1.28%-9.17%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and FAAR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.01

The correlation between VNQ and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNQ vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQ
FAAR

Real Estate

97.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
100.0%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
FAAR

-

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
FAAR

-

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
FAAR

-

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
FAAR

-

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
FAAR

-

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
FAAR
100.0%

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
FAAR

-

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

FAAR

-

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

FAAR

-

Healthcare

VNQ

-

FAAR

-

Utilities

VNQ

-

FAAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNQFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

6.79

-5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

18.23

-13.34

VNQ vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-18.03%

-55.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-4.85%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-11.54%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-18.03%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-18.03%

-24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.52%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.61%

-7.83%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.80%

+0.85%

Volatility

VNQ vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.28%. This indicates that VNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

2.28%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

9.69%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

13.49%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

13.02%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

11.52%

+9.20%

VNQ vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNQ vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than FAAR's 9.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.38%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.54%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and FAAR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FAAR (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 10-year performance, VNQ leads with 5.65% vs 4.91% for FAAR. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VNQ has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 3.54% for VNQ.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer