VNQ vs. ENGW.L

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while ENGW.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.53%/yr vs 5.56%/yr for ENGW.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENGW.L.

Performance

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VNQ is traded in USD, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than ENGW.L's 29.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VNQ having a 5.53% annualized return and ENGW.L not far ahead at 5.56%.

VNQ

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

ENGW.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 29.17%
• 6M: 29.05%
• 1Y: 41.79%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	11.49%	3.24%	4.81%	11.85%	-26.25%	40.54%	-4.61%	28.91%	-6.03%	4.90%
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	29.17%	15.28%	1.82%	3.10%	7.85%	39.21%	-28.99%	15.83%	-20.56%	15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and ENGW.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and ENGW.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VNQ vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ

VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 32
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ENGW.L

ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNQ	ENGW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.03	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.57	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	3.37	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	11.16	-6.45

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and ENGW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, smaller than the maximum ENGW.L drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and ENGW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNQ	ENGW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.07%	-79.21%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-12.46%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	-18.79%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.48%	-35.50%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.40%	-70.27%	+27.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-6.85%	+6.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	-34.12%	+20.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	3.76%	-1.11%

Volatility

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNQ	ENGW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	6.43%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	17.87%	-8.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	20.70%	-7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	26.66%	-7.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	29.32%	-8.60%

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNQ vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	3.57%	3.92%	3.85%	3.95%	3.91%	2.56%	3.93%	3.39%	4.74%	4.23%	4.82%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNQ and ENGW.L in my portfolio?

VNQ and ENGW.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VNQ or ENGW.L?

On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNQ or ENGW.L?

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

What is the main difference between VNQ and ENGW.L?

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while ENGW.L is Energy Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.30% for ENGW.L.