PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNMC vs. CCSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNMC vs. CCSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VNMC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCSO

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.07%
YTD
20.40%
6M
19.46%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNMC vs. CCSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VNMC
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%10.34%16.92%2.24%
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
20.40%21.79%3.89%14.58%-11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VNMC and CCSO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2022

0.51

The correlation between VNMC and CCSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNMC vs. CCSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNMC
CCSO

Industrials

24.0%
53.5%

Financial Services

16.9%
0.4%

Technology

15.6%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.3%

Basic Materials

10.2%
15.2%

Healthcare

7.6%

-

Energy

5.9%
7.0%

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
0.1%

Utilities

0.7%
6.2%

Industrials

VNMC
24.0%
CCSO
53.5%

Financial Services

VNMC
16.9%
CCSO
0.4%

Technology

VNMC
15.6%
CCSO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VNMC
10.8%
CCSO
9.3%

Basic Materials

VNMC
10.2%
CCSO
15.2%

Healthcare

VNMC
7.6%
CCSO

-

Energy

VNMC
5.9%
CCSO
7.0%

Real Estate

VNMC
4.6%
CCSO

-

Communication Services

VNMC
2.0%
CCSO

-

Consumer Defensive

VNMC
1.7%
CCSO
0.1%

Utilities

VNMC
0.7%
CCSO
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNMC vs. CCSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNMC

CCSO
CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNMC vs. CCSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VNMC vs. CCSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNMCCCSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

VNMC vs. CCSO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNMCCCSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

Volatility

VNMC vs. CCSO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNMCCCSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

VNMC vs. CCSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNMC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNMC vs. CCSO - Dividend Comparison

VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
0.53%0.63%0.53%0.80%0.24%0.00%0.00%
VNMC
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.08%4.30%10.12%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNMC and CCSO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

CCSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.

They also come from different issuers: Groupe BPCE and Carbon Collective. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VNMC and 0.35% for CCSO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNMC and CCSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer