VNM vs. QQQ
VNM (VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Vietnam Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNM returned 3.26%/yr vs 20.46%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VNM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
VNM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.26%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.46% annualized return.
VNM
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.96%
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 20.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.40B | $28.17B | $31.69B | |
| $13.14M | $11.75M | $11.73M |
VNM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | -8.28% | 66.55% | -11.15% | 15.01% | -43.74% | 22.05% | 9.84% | 9.24% | -16.83% | 38.80% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 14.23% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNM and QQQ is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2009 | 0.40 |
The correlation between VNM and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNM
QQQ
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
VNM
QQQ
Real Estate
VNM
QQQ
Industrials
VNM
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
VNM
QQQ
Basic Materials
VNM
QQQ
Technology
VNM
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
VNM
QQQ
Energy
VNM
QQQ
Utilities
VNM
QQQ
Communication Services
VNM
-
QQQ
Healthcare
VNM
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VNM
QQQ
VNM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.27 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 7.21 | -5.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -82.97% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -11.96% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.60% | -22.77% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.95% | -35.12% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.67% | -35.12% | -16.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -6.07% | -22.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.73% | -32.61% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | 3.76% | +4.22% |
Volatility
VNM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.96%. This indicates that VNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 6.96% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 16.12% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.88% | 19.37% | +7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 22.92% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 22.51% | +1.02% |
VNM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 5.21% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.40% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 1.14% | 2.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNM has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to QQQ (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNM dropped -63.19% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.46% vs 3.26% for VNM. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.22% for VNM.
VNM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer