PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNM vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VNM vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VNM vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-9.28%66.55%-11.15%15.01%-43.74%22.05%9.84%9.24%-16.83%38.80%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
7.00%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 3.56%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.


VNM

1D
2.73%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
-9.28%
6M
-2.77%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
3.56%

GDX

1D
6.97%
1M
-20.78%
YTD
7.00%
6M
20.99%
1Y
101.08%
3Y*
43.23%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VNM vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VNM vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNM vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNMGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

2.21

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

2.45

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.34

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

12.07

-6.12

VNM vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNM and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNMGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.21

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.67

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.47

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.14

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between VNM and GDX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VNM vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than GDX's 0.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.69%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Drawdowns

VNM vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and GDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VNMGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-80.34%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.24%

-30.84%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

-46.51%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

-49.79%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.34%

-20.78%

-8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.99%

-40.61%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

8.52%

-1.77%

Volatility

VNM vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 9.41%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VNMGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

18.51%

-9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.06%

38.19%

-18.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

46.00%

-13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

35.73%

-11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

37.44%

-14.06%