VNLA vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNLA is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. VNLA is passively managed, while BCI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNLA returned 3.79%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for BCI. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNLA charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

VNLA vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.

VNLA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 4.75%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNLA vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	1.43%	5.45%	6.41%	6.09%	-0.17%	-0.18%	3.01%	4.43%	0.02%	1.51%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	26.18%	-2.77%	7.06%	-11.21%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VNLA and BCI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017	0.02

The correlation between VNLA and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNLA vs. BCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNLA	BCI
Energy	66.7%	-
Industrials	33.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VNLA vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNLA

VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 98
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNLA vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VNLA	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.55	2.30	+5.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	15.48	2.92	+12.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.58	1.41	+2.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.15	5.10	+6.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.27	13.14	+44.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VNLA vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNLA Sharpe Ratio is 7.55, which is higher than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNLA and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VNLA	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55	2.30	+5.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	3.66	0.66	+3.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	0.48	+1.62

Drawdowns

VNLA vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNLA	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-32.69%	+28.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.43%	-7.61%	+7.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.49%	-11.38%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.76%	-26.50%	+24.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-4.52%	+4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-12.00%	+11.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	2.95%	-2.87%

Volatility

VNLA vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.18%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNLA	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.18%	5.16%	-4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.46%	14.80%	-14.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63%	16.92%	-16.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.04%	16.82%	-15.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.42%	15.65%	-14.23%

VNLA vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VNLA vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than BCI's 13.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%	0.00%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	4.78%	4.84%	4.97%	3.95%	4.35%	1.67%	1.21%	3.13%	2.43%	1.79%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNLA and BCI in my portfolio?

VNLA and BCI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNLA or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, VNLA or BCI?

On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 11.07% vs 3.79% for VNLA. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNLA or BCI?

Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNLA or BCI?

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNLA or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 4.78% for VNLA.

What is the main difference between VNLA and BCI?

VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.