PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. ROAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNAM vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return.


VNAM

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
1.38%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
10Y*

ROAM

1D
-1.60%
1M
8.68%
YTD
26.83%
6M
28.99%
1Y
51.96%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNAM vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-2.39%67.05%-7.78%12.95%-44.16%2.41%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
26.83%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and ROAM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.28

The correlation between VNAM and ROAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNAM vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNAM
ROAM

Real Estate

38.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

25.5%
19.3%

Industrials

12.8%
5.6%

Basic Materials

9.0%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.8%

Technology

4.7%
39.4%

Energy

1.9%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
7.6%

Utilities

0.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Real Estate

VNAM
38.6%
ROAM
1.3%

Financial Services

VNAM
25.5%
ROAM
19.3%

Industrials

VNAM
12.8%
ROAM
5.6%

Basic Materials

VNAM
9.0%
ROAM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VNAM
5.9%
ROAM
4.8%

Technology

VNAM
4.7%
ROAM
39.4%

Energy

VNAM
1.9%
ROAM
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VNAM
0.9%
ROAM
7.6%

Utilities

VNAM
0.7%
ROAM
2.3%

Communication Services

VNAM

-

ROAM
6.0%

Healthcare

VNAM

-

ROAM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNAM vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNAMROAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

5.27

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

19.91

-12.57

VNAM vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNAMROAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

3.50

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.38

-0.41

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than ROAM's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and ROAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMROAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-45.47%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-9.92%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

-16.79%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-1.60%

-7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-11.13%

-19.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.62%

+3.19%

Volatility

VNAM vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.41%. This indicates that VNAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNAMROAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.41%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

12.76%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

14.93%

+11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

15.23%

+10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

17.87%

+7.73%

VNAM vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNAM vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ROAM's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.50%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.51%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNAM and ROAM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNAM has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to ROAM (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNAM dropped -52.84% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

On 3-year performance, ROAM leads with 26.00% vs 16.20% for VNAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 26.00% return vs 16.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for VNAM and 0.44% for ROAM.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNAM and ROAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer