VNAM vs. FEMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS).
VNAM and FEMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VNAM is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. It was launched on Dec 7, 2021. FEMS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2012. Both VNAM and FEMS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VNAM vs. FEMS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VNAM vs. FEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | -8.51% | 67.05% | -7.78% | 12.95% | -44.16% | 2.41% |
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 8.59% | 16.48% | 1.88% | 3.55% | 1.85% | 1.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly lower than FEMS's 8.59% return.
VNAM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -8.51%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VNAM vs. FEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VNAM vs. FEMS — Risk / Return Rank
VNAM
FEMS
VNAM vs. FEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNAM | FEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 2.06 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.03 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | 7.87 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNAM | FEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.27 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between VNAM and FEMS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
VNAM vs. FEMS - Dividend Comparison
VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than FEMS's 4.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | 0.54% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 0.49% | 1.04% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 4.42% | 4.27% | 3.97% | 4.65% | 4.55% | 6.25% | 2.90% | 4.37% | 4.68% | 3.39% | 2.42% | 3.28% |
Drawdowns
VNAM vs. FEMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than FEMS's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and FEMS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNAM | FEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.84% | -47.85% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.03% | -11.13% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.62% | -4.85% | -8.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.54% | -17.58% | -13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 3.42% | +2.53% |
Volatility
VNAM vs. FEMS - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) at 7.00%. This indicates that VNAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VNAM | FEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 7.00% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | 11.79% | +8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.59% | 17.55% | +15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 17.86% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 19.96% | +5.53% |