PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVFX vs. GWOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMVFX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 15.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VMVFX has underperformed GWOAX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while GWOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.


VMVFX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.99%
6M
8.43%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
9.46%

GWOAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.06%
YTD
15.86%
6M
17.59%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
7.99%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
15.86%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVFX and GWOAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.81

The correlation between VMVFX and GWOAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVFX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMVFXGWOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.55

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

4.27

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

17.06

-9.14

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVFX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMVFXGWOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

3.03

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.71

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.47

+0.34

Drawdowns

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVFX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum GWOAX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVFX and GWOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVFXGWOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-49.84%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-8.78%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.96%

-16.11%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-26.21%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.09%

-35.28%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.44%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-9.00%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.19%

-0.59%

Volatility

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) is 1.98%, while GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that VMVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVFXGWOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.26%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

9.47%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

12.40%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

15.22%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

16.50%

-4.02%

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMVFX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

VMVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than GWOAX's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.85%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.24%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMVFX and GWOAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWOAX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to VMVFX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVFX dropped -33.09% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVFX and GWOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer