VMVFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMVFX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMVFX having a 9.02% annualized return and FGIAX not far behind at 8.70%.
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMVFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VMVFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
VMVFX
FGIAX
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.75 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.26 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.61 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 12.12 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.75 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.80 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.42 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMVFX and FGIAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
VMVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMVFX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -49.35% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -8.29% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -21.08% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.09% | -38.02% | +4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -3.78% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -7.22% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.78% | -0.15% |
Volatility
VMVFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) is 2.61%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that VMVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 4.05% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 7.09% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 12.28% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 13.08% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 15.17% | -2.69% |