VMOT vs. VFMO
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. VMOT is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.94%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for VFMO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
VMOT vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.68% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VMOT vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 17.28% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -17.93% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and VFMO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VMOT and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMOT vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMOT
VFMO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
VMOT
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
VMOT
VFMO
Technology
VMOT
VFMO
Energy
VMOT
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
VMOT
VFMO
Healthcare
VMOT
VFMO
Financial Services
VMOT
VFMO
Communication Services
VMOT
VFMO
Basic Materials
VMOT
VFMO
Utilities
VMOT
VFMO
Real Estate
VMOT
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
VFMO
VMOT vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMOT | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.96 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | 14.97 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMOT | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.05 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.66 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -36.77% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -10.98% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -24.40% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -25.80% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -7.77% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.90% | -0.32% |
Volatility
VMOT vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 5.00%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 6.20% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 16.37% | -3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 21.20% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 21.70% | -6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 23.57% | -8.67% |
VMOT vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VFMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and VFMO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VMOT (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs 6.94% for VMOT. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.13% for VFMO.
VMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer