VMOT vs. SEIM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. VMOT is passively managed, while SEIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VMOT returned 18.21%/yr vs 29.06%/yr for SEIM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIM.

Performance

VMOT vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than SEIM's 18.33% return.

VMOT

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 29.85%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

SEIM

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 6M: 16.44%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: 29.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMOT vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	13.98%	18.54%	12.07%	-0.74%	-0.89%
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF	18.33%	20.20%	39.12%	16.25%	-5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and SEIM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.64

The correlation between VMOT and SEIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VMOT	SEIM
Industrials	19.9%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	7.2%
Technology	11.4%	29.5%
Energy	8.6%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	7.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.5%
Financial Services	8.1%	8.1%
Communication Services	7.3%	4.4%
Basic Materials	5.1%	4.7%
Utilities	3.3%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.6%	7.2%

Return for Risk

VMOT vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMOT

VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 61
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SEIM

SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 68
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMOT vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMOT	SEIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.01	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.72	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	3.48	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	14.90	-3.62

VMOT vs. SEIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the SEIM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and SEIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and SEIM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMOT	SEIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-22.17%	-12.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-10.07%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	-22.17%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	-2.24%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-3.97%	-9.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.35%	+0.30%

Volatility

VMOT vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 5.92%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMOT	SEIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	7.15%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	14.49%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	17.45%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	19.09%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	19.09%	-4.13%

VMOT vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMOT vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF	0.52%	0.56%	0.48%	0.89%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	1.80%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMOT and SEIM in my portfolio?

VMOT and SEIM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMOT or SEIM?

SEIM has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to VMOT (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs SEIM's -22.17%.

Which ETF is better, VMOT or SEIM?

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 29.06% vs 18.21% for VMOT. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VMOT or SEIM?

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 29.06% return vs 18.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VMOT or SEIM?

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VMOT or SEIM?

VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

What is the main difference between VMOT and SEIM?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and SEI. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.15% for SEIM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.