VMOT vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMOT is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while IMFL is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.94%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for IMFL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

VMOT vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VMOT having a 17.28% return and IMFL slightly higher at 17.58%.

VMOT

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 20.07%
• 1Y: 34.59%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: 20.95%
• 1Y: 33.05%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMOT vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	17.28%	18.54%	12.07%	-0.74%	-7.00%	-2.51%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	17.58%	30.89%	-3.57%	25.51%	-17.32%	6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and IMFL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021	0.67

The correlation between VMOT and IMFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. IMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VMOT	IMFL
Industrials	19.9%	17.4%
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	7.5%
Technology	11.4%	15.4%
Energy	8.6%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	12.8%
Financial Services	8.1%	11.0%
Communication Services	7.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	5.1%	5.5%
Utilities	3.3%	3.9%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.5%

Return for Risk

VMOT vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMOT

VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 69
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 60
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMOT vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VMOT	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.12	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.88	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	2.82	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	9.97	+3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VMOT vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and IMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VMOT	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.12	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.53	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.62	-0.27

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, roughly equal to the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMOT	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-33.26%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-11.77%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	-13.52%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.73%	-33.26%	+9.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.54%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.32%	-7.24%	-6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.32%	-0.74%

Volatility

VMOT vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 5.00%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMOT	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	5.74%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	13.08%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	15.71%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	16.05%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.90%	15.99%	-1.09%

VMOT vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMOT vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than IMFL's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.87%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	1.75%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMOT and IMFL in my portfolio?

VMOT and IMFL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMOT or IMFL?

IMFL has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to VMOT (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs IMFL's -33.26%.

Which ETF is better, VMOT or IMFL?

On 5-year performance, IMFL leads with 8.50% vs 6.94% for VMOT. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VMOT or IMFL?

Over the 5-year period, IMFL has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VMOT or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VMOT or IMFL?

IMFL has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

What is the main difference between VMOT and IMFL?

VMOT is categorized as Momentum, while IMFL is Global Equities. VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while IMFL tracks FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.34% for IMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.