VMOT vs. DVOL
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds - VMOT tracks the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index while DVOL tracks the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.94%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for DVOL. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
VMOT vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
VMOT vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 17.28% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -14.97% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and DVOL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between VMOT and DVOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMOT vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMOT
DVOL
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
VMOT
DVOL
Consumer Cyclical
VMOT
DVOL
Technology
VMOT
DVOL
Energy
VMOT
DVOL
Consumer Defensive
VMOT
DVOL
Healthcare
VMOT
DVOL
Financial Services
VMOT
DVOL
Communication Services
VMOT
DVOL
Basic Materials
VMOT
DVOL
Utilities
VMOT
DVOL
Real Estate
VMOT
DVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
DVOL
VMOT vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMOT | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.02 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 0.08 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | 0.30 | +13.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMOT | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.07 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -38.26% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -9.82% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -11.66% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -24.65% | +0.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -4.85% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -7.17% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.87% | -0.29% |
Volatility
VMOT vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.91% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 9.35% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 11.79% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 14.40% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 17.72% | -2.82% |
VMOT vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and DVOL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMOT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 5-year performance, VMOT leads with 6.94% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, DVOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VMOT has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.68% for DVOL.
VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.60% for DVOL.
VMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer