PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMNFX vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMNFX vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMNFX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VMNFX has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 5.04%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


VMNFX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.75%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.84%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
5.04%

PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMNFX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
12.24%9.27%5.78%12.23%13.48%23.24%-11.58%-9.57%0.60%-4.89%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VMNFX and PG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 1998

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMNFX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMNFX
VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMNFX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMNFXPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.97

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

-0.37

+4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

-0.68

+12.82

VMNFX vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMNFX and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMNFX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMNFX drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMNFX and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMNFXPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-54.25%

+27.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-15.52%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-21.15%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.75%

-23.77%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-23.77%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-13.29%

+13.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-12.16%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

8.80%

-7.14%

Volatility

VMNFX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) is 1.65%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that VMNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMNFXPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

6.99%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

15.01%

-9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

18.78%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

17.82%

-10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

19.05%

-12.66%

Dividends

VMNFX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

VMNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
3.13%3.53%5.61%5.09%0.75%0.16%0.81%3.16%0.94%1.07%0.38%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMNFX and PG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to VMNFX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMNFX dropped -26.42% vs PG's -54.25%.

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMNFX and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer