PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMMSX vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMMSX vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMMSX achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VMMSX has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.72%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


VMMSX

1D
1.46%
1M
5.99%
YTD
20.95%
6M
22.99%
1Y
48.86%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.72%

VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMMSX vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
20.95%35.68%5.91%10.58%-18.15%-1.40%15.79%21.42%-12.53%32.01%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VMMSX and VWO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2011

0.94

The correlation between VMMSX and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMMSX vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMMSX
VWO

Technology

23.4%
29.6%

Financial Services

20.1%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
10.7%

Industrials

7.2%
8.0%

Communication Services

6.6%
7.1%

Basic Materials

6.1%
8.0%

Energy

5.5%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.7%

Utilities

2.1%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.2%

Healthcare

1.2%
3.9%

Technology

VMMSX
23.4%
VWO
29.6%

Financial Services

VMMSX
20.1%
VWO
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMMSX
13.3%
VWO
10.7%

Industrials

VMMSX
7.2%
VWO
8.0%

Communication Services

VMMSX
6.6%
VWO
7.1%

Basic Materials

VMMSX
6.1%
VWO
8.0%

Energy

VMMSX
5.5%
VWO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VMMSX
5.2%
VWO
3.7%

Utilities

VMMSX
2.1%
VWO
2.9%

Real Estate

VMMSX
1.9%
VWO
2.2%

Healthcare

VMMSX
1.2%
VWO
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMMSX vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMMSX
VMMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VMMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMMSX vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMMSXVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.36

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.76

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

9.96

+4.57

VMMSX vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMMSX and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMMSXVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

1.94

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.30

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.46

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.27

+0.06

Drawdowns

VMMSX vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMMSX drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMMSX and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMMSXVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-67.68%

+28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-11.17%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-17.37%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.39%

-32.64%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-36.39%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-15.82%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.09%

+0.29%

Volatility

VMMSX vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 5.61%. This indicates that VMMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMMSXVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

5.61%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

13.22%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

15.89%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

17.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

19.20%

-0.82%

VMMSX vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMMSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMMSX vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

VMMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VWO's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
1.92%2.32%3.33%3.05%3.71%6.80%1.04%2.04%2.53%1.54%1.44%1.87%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VMMSX and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMMSX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to VWO (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMMSX dropped -39.28% vs VWO's -67.68%.

VMMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMMSX and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer