PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMLTX vs. DFSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMLTX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VMLTX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.


VMLTX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
2.13%

DFSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.17%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*
1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMLTX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
1.01%5.39%3.14%4.19%-2.98%0.83%3.30%4.11%1.56%2.02%
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.95%2.30%2.84%2.98%-0.36%-0.11%0.83%1.62%1.22%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VMLTX and DFSMX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2002

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between VMLTX and DFSMX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMLTX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMLTX
VMLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VMLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VMLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSMX
DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMLTXDFSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

4.46

-2.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

12.85

-9.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

76.74

-67.24

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMLTX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMLTXDFSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

4.16

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

2.18

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

1.64

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

1.79

+0.14

Drawdowns

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMLTX and DFSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMLTXDFSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-2.66%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-0.20%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.02%

-0.49%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

-1.66%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.41%

-1.69%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.23%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.03%

+0.43%

Volatility

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.14%. This indicates that VMLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMLTXDFSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.14%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

0.37%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49%

0.61%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.86%

0.79%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.93%

0.77%

+1.16%

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMLTX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMLTX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

VMLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than DFSMX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.36%2.08%2.80%1.94%0.63%0.19%0.83%1.22%1.11%0.95%0.94%0.95%
VMLTX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
3.07%3.75%3.27%2.30%1.56%1.64%1.62%2.01%1.81%1.55%1.52%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMLTX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMLTX has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to DFSMX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMLTX dropped -6.41% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMLTX and DFSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer