PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VMLTX vs. DFCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VMLTX and DFCMX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.81%
1.35%
VMLTX
DFCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VMLTX:

1.58

DFCMX:

3.53

Sortino Ratio

VMLTX:

2.41

DFCMX:

6.20

Omega Ratio

VMLTX:

1.39

DFCMX:

2.59

Calmar Ratio

VMLTX:

2.59

DFCMX:

13.43

Martin Ratio

VMLTX:

7.19

DFCMX:

64.47

Ulcer Index

VMLTX:

0.36%

DFCMX:

0.04%

Daily Std Dev

VMLTX:

1.65%

DFCMX:

0.75%

Max Drawdown

VMLTX:

-6.41%

DFCMX:

-2.20%

Current Drawdown

VMLTX:

-0.91%

DFCMX:

-0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMLTX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than DFCMX's 2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VMLTX has outperformed DFCMX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while DFCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.01% annualized return.


VMLTX

YTD

2.29%

1M

-0.22%

6M

1.81%

1Y

2.61%

5Y*

1.45%

10Y*

1.61%

DFCMX

YTD

2.63%

1M

-0.05%

6M

1.35%

1Y

2.63%

5Y*

1.02%

10Y*

1.01%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMLTX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCMX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


DFCMX
DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for DFCMX: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%
Expense ratio chart for VMLTX: current value at 0.17% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.17%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VMLTX, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.583.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for VMLTX, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.416.20
The chart of Omega ratio for VMLTX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.392.59
The chart of Calmar ratio for VMLTX, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.5913.43
The chart of Martin ratio for VMLTX, currently valued at 7.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.007.1964.47
VMLTX
DFCMX

The current VMLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the DFCMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMLTX and DFCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.58
3.53
VMLTX
DFCMX

Dividends

VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Dividend Comparison

VMLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than DFCMX's 2.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VMLTX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
2.76%2.30%1.57%1.23%1.63%1.87%1.82%1.55%1.53%1.51%1.61%1.67%
DFCMX
DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.40%1.89%0.70%0.36%0.86%1.16%1.05%0.88%0.88%0.82%0.81%0.85%

Drawdowns

VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, which is greater than DFCMX's maximum drawdown of -2.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMLTX and DFCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.91%
-0.10%
VMLTX
DFCMX

Volatility

VMLTX vs. DFCMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX) at 0.34%. This indicates that VMLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.63%
0.34%
VMLTX
DFCMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab