PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMLTX vs. FMNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VMLTX at 1.01% and FMNDX at 1.01%. Over the past 10 years, VMLTX has outperformed FMNDX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while FMNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


VMLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.08%

FMNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.37%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMLTX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
1.01%5.39%3.14%4.19%-2.98%0.83%3.30%4.11%1.56%2.02%
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.01%3.31%3.04%3.37%-0.09%0.03%0.86%2.00%1.58%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VMLTX and FMNDX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.46

The correlation between VMLTX and FMNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMLTX vs. FMNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMLTX
VMLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VMLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VMLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FMNDX
FMNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FMNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMLTXFMNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

3.45

-1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

9.99

-7.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

41.56

-33.07

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the FMNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMLTX and FMNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, which is greater than FMNDX's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMLTX and FMNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMLTXFMNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-1.69%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-0.30%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.02%

-1.09%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

-1.09%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.41%

-1.69%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.10%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.07%

+0.40%

Volatility

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VMLTX) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) at 0.24%. This indicates that VMLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMLTXFMNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.13%

0.63%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49%

0.94%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.86%

1.06%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.93%

0.91%

+1.02%

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMLTX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FMNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMLTX vs. FMNDX - Dividend Comparison

VMLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than FMNDX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
2.82%2.95%2.99%2.60%0.61%0.23%0.85%1.58%1.46%1.00%0.75%0.38%
VMLTX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
3.07%3.75%3.27%2.30%1.56%1.64%1.62%2.01%1.81%1.55%1.52%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMLTX and FMNDX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMLTX has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to FMNDX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMLTX dropped -6.41% vs FMNDX's -1.69%.

FMNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMLTX and FMNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer