PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMIG.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VMIG.L is traded in GBP, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.


VMIG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.25%
YTD
5.18%
6M
7.41%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
12.28%
6M
15.08%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
5.18%12.85%7.41%8.08%-17.25%16.12%-4.72%-0.03%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VMIG.L and UD03.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.22

Over the past year, VMIG.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMIG.L
UD03.L

Industrials

19.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

19.4%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
7.0%

Real Estate

9.4%

-

Technology

9.4%
16.2%

Basic Materials

6.6%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
14.6%

Communication Services

5.9%
3.1%

Healthcare

4.4%
4.1%

Utilities

3.0%
7.7%

Energy

2.5%
2.7%

Industrials

VMIG.L
19.9%
UD03.L
12.1%

Financial Services

VMIG.L
19.4%
UD03.L
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMIG.L
13.3%
UD03.L
7.0%

Real Estate

VMIG.L
9.4%
UD03.L

-

Technology

VMIG.L
9.4%
UD03.L
16.2%

Basic Materials

VMIG.L
6.6%
UD03.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VMIG.L
6.1%
UD03.L
14.6%

Communication Services

VMIG.L
5.9%
UD03.L
3.1%

Healthcare

VMIG.L
4.4%
UD03.L
4.1%

Utilities

VMIG.L
3.0%
UD03.L
7.7%

Energy

VMIG.L
2.5%
UD03.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMIG.L
VMIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMIG.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.61

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

5.70

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

16.25

-11.84

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMIG.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMIG.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

3.47

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

1.75

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.19

-0.88

Drawdowns

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMIG.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-30.85%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-9.80%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-11.72%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-18.67%

-10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.19%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-3.31%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.56%

-0.34%

Volatility

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMIG.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.58%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

16.13%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

27.46%

-12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

47.29%

-29.98%

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMIG.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

VMIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMIG.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer