PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMIG.L vs. S250.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VMIG.L is traded in GBP, while S250.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S250.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VMIG.L having a 5.18% return and S250.L slightly higher at 5.31%.


VMIG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.25%
YTD
5.18%
6M
7.41%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

S250.L

1D
0.50%
1M
4.20%
YTD
5.31%
6M
7.34%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
5.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
5.18%12.85%7.41%8.08%-17.25%16.12%-4.72%14.21%
S250.L
Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF
5.31%12.81%7.93%7.60%-17.52%16.69%-4.90%14.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VMIG.L and S250.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.98

The correlation between VMIG.L and S250.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMIG.L
S250.L

Industrials

19.9%
19.9%

Financial Services

19.4%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
13.3%

Real Estate

9.4%
9.4%

Technology

9.4%
9.3%

Basic Materials

6.6%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
6.1%

Communication Services

5.9%
5.9%

Healthcare

4.4%
4.4%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Energy

2.5%
2.5%

Industrials

VMIG.L
19.9%
S250.L
19.9%

Financial Services

VMIG.L
19.4%
S250.L
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMIG.L
13.3%
S250.L
13.3%

Real Estate

VMIG.L
9.4%
S250.L
9.4%

Technology

VMIG.L
9.4%
S250.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

VMIG.L
6.6%
S250.L
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

VMIG.L
6.1%
S250.L
6.1%

Communication Services

VMIG.L
5.9%
S250.L
5.9%

Healthcare

VMIG.L
4.4%
S250.L
4.4%

Utilities

VMIG.L
3.0%
S250.L
3.0%

Energy

VMIG.L
2.5%
S250.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMIG.L vs. S250.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMIG.L
VMIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

S250.L
S250.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
S250.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S250.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
S250.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
S250.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
S250.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMIG.LS250.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

4.49

-0.08

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the S250.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMIG.L and S250.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMIG.LS250.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.23

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.55

-0.24

Drawdowns

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, roughly equal to the maximum S250.L drawdown of -40.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and S250.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMIG.LS250.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-40.91%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-11.48%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-16.16%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-29.69%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.69%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-7.19%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.19%

+0.03%

Volatility

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) is 3.70%, while Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that VMIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S250.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMIG.LS250.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.15%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

10.33%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.41%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.95%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

16.43%

+0.88%

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than S250.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMIG.L vs. S250.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VMIG.L nor S250.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VMIG.L and S250.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S250.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.12% for S250.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and S250.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer