S250.L vs. L100.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L).
S250.L and L100.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. S250.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. L100.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Nov 9, 2017. Both S250.L and L100.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: S250.L or L100.L.
Correlation
The correlation between S250.L and L100.L is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
S250.L vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
S250.L:
0.90
L100.L:
1.64
S250.L:
1.33
L100.L:
2.37
S250.L:
1.16
L100.L:
1.29
S250.L:
0.66
L100.L:
3.36
S250.L:
3.88
L100.L:
9.45
S250.L:
2.76%
L100.L:
1.73%
S250.L:
11.91%
L100.L:
9.97%
S250.L:
-40.91%
L100.L:
-44.41%
S250.L:
-6.51%
L100.L:
-1.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S250.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than L100.L's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, S250.L has underperformed L100.L with an annualized return of 4.34%, while L100.L has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.
S250.L
0.31%
0.32%
-1.70%
10.24%
1.37%
4.34%
L100.L
6.49%
1.68%
5.20%
16.66%
6.75%
6.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
S250.L vs. L100.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S250.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than L100.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
S250.L vs. L100.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
S250.L
L100.L
S250.L vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
S250.L vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S250.L nor L100.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
S250.L vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S250.L drawdown since its inception was -40.91%, smaller than the maximum L100.L drawdown of -44.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S250.L and L100.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
S250.L vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) at 2.33%. This indicates that S250.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.