VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L
VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - VMIG.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMIG.L returned 6.49%/yr vs 21.33%/yr for CMB1.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMIG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.
Performance
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VMIG.L is traded in GBP, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.84% return.
VMIG.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CMB1.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- YTD
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 27.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 6.20% | 13.52% | 11.01% | 11.96% | -14.58% | 19.28% | -2.22% | 17.54% |
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 16.84% | 43.83% | 13.25% | 30.68% | -3.56% | 18.29% | 1.52% | 14.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIG.L and CMB1.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VMIG.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Financial Services
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Consumer Cyclical
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Technology
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Real Estate
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Basic Materials
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Consumer Defensive
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Communication Services
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Healthcare
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Utilities
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Energy
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMIG.L
CMB1.L
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMIG.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 3.28 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 11.74 | -8.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and CMB1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMIG.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -56.05% | +14.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -10.32% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.60% | -15.62% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.02% | -24.19% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.96% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -15.16% | +7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.89% | +0.35% |
Volatility
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) is 3.13%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that VMIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMIG.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 3.99% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 12.72% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 15.22% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 17.98% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 20.03% | -2.73% |
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMIG.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VMIG.L nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.51% | 3.22% | 3.33% | 3.21% | 2.55% | 2.05% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMIG.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.
VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.
Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and CMB1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer