VMIAX vs. VOO
VMIAX (Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - VMIAX is a Materials fund managed by Vanguard, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, VMIAX returned 10.36%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMIAX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
VMIAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMIAX achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VMIAX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.36%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
VMIAX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
VMIAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIAX Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares | 13.48% | 12.26% | 0.45% | 13.69% | -11.77% | 27.15% | 19.37% | 23.59% | -17.38% | 23.68% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIAX and VOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VMIAX and VOO has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VMIAX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMIAX
VOO
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
VMIAX
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
VMIAX
VOO
Industrials
VMIAX
VOO
Energy
VMIAX
VOO
Healthcare
VMIAX
VOO
Technology
VMIAX
VOO
Consumer Defensive
VMIAX
VOO
Communication Services
VMIAX
-
VOO
Financial Services
VMIAX
-
VOO
Real Estate
VMIAX
-
VOO
Utilities
VMIAX
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMIAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
VMIAX
VOO
VMIAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMIAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.16 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 14.73 | -8.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.39 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.87 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.89 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
VMIAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIAX drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIAX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -33.99% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -8.90% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -18.69% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.45% | -24.52% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.02% | -33.99% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -0.70% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -3.69% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 1.91% | +2.17% |
Volatility
VMIAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMIAX) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that VMIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 2.84% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 8.90% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 11.80% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 16.81% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 18.01% | +3.22% |
VMIAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMIAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
VMIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIAX Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.33% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 1.73% | 2.31% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMIAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMIAX has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMIAX dropped -62.17% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMIAX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer