VMGRX vs. TAAGX
VMGRX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMGRX returned 10.76%/yr vs 17.25%/yr for TAAGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VMGRX charges 0.33%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.
Performance
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMGRX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 42.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VMGRX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.25% annualized return.
VMGRX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TAAGX
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 42.04%
- 6M
- 39.72%
- 1Y
- 66.27%
- 3Y*
- 36.09%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 17.25%
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGRX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 3.94% | 8.80% | 17.73% | 24.15% | -30.13% | 9.21% | 33.40% | 32.06% | -3.52% | 21.60% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 42.04% | 16.01% | 36.81% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 19.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMGRX and TAAGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2000 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VMGRX and TAAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMGRX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
VMGRX
TAAGX
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 7.33 | -6.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 28.11 | -26.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.74%, which is greater than TAAGX's maximum drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGRX and TAAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.74% | -62.13% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.09% | -9.26% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -29.24% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.71% | -34.47% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.71% | -34.47% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | 0.00% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -18.66% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 2.41% | +3.74% |
Volatility
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) is 7.75%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that VMGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 9.03% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 18.23% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.11% | 22.32% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 23.63% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.44% | -0.03% |
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMGRX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMGRX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
VMGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.07%, more than TAAGX's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.42% | 3.44% | 17.62% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
VMGRX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 17.07% | 17.74% | 1.80% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 34.53% | 6.30% | 10.43% | 14.53% | 3.13% | 0.67% | 8.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMGRX and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAAGX has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to VMGRX (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGRX dropped -71.74% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.
TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMGRX and TAAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer