PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMGRX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMGRX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VMGRX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.76%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


VMGRX

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.36%
YTD
3.94%
6M
2.01%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
10.76%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMGRX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund
3.94%8.80%17.73%24.15%-30.13%9.21%33.40%32.06%-3.52%21.60%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VMGRX and QQQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.85

The correlation between VMGRX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMGRX
QQQ

Technology

25.5%
58.7%

Consumer Cyclical

22.2%
11.4%

Industrials

17.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

15.3%
14.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
3.7%

Financial Services

4.2%
0.2%

Energy

3.3%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
6.4%

Utilities

2.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.0%

Technology

VMGRX
25.5%
QQQ
58.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VMGRX
22.2%
QQQ
11.4%

Industrials

VMGRX
17.9%
QQQ
2.6%

Communication Services

VMGRX
15.3%
QQQ
14.3%

Healthcare

VMGRX
8.1%
QQQ
3.7%

Financial Services

VMGRX
4.2%
QQQ
0.2%

Energy

VMGRX
3.3%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

VMGRX
3.2%
QQQ
6.4%

Utilities

VMGRX
2.0%
QQQ
1.2%

Real Estate

VMGRX
1.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

VMGRX
1.4%
QQQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMGRX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMGRX
VMGRX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VMGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMGRXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.93

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

10.86

-9.15

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMGRX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.74%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGRX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMGRXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.74%

-82.97%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.09%

-11.96%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-22.77%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.71%

-35.12%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

-35.12%

-4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-4.25%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.45%

-32.73%

+8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

3.22%

+2.93%

Volatility

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) is 7.75%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that VMGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMGRXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

9.17%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

14.57%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

17.96%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

22.69%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

22.42%

-0.01%

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMGRX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMGRX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

VMGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.07%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VMGRX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund
17.07%17.74%1.80%0.39%0.26%34.53%6.30%10.43%14.53%3.13%0.67%8.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMGRX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to VMGRX (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGRX dropped -71.74% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMGRX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer