VMGRX vs. LSHAX
VMGRX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMGRX returned 10.65%/yr vs 17.24%/yr for LSHAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMGRX charges 0.33%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for LSHAX.
Performance
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMGRX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VMGRX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.24% annualized return.
VMGRX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
LSHAX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 26.51%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 7.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.24%
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGRX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 2.86% | 8.80% | 17.73% | 24.15% | -30.13% | 9.21% | 33.40% | 32.06% | -3.52% | 21.60% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 26.51% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMGRX and LSHAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VMGRX and LSHAX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMGRX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
VMGRX
LSHAX
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.20 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 0.43 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.74%, roughly equal to the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGRX and LSHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.74% | -69.03% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.09% | -28.39% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -45.79% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.71% | -45.79% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.71% | -50.78% | +11.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -28.86% | +27.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -21.96% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 13.54% | -7.39% |
Volatility
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) is 7.90%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that VMGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 11.92% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 30.13% | -13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 38.34% | -18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 34.43% | -10.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 30.81% | -8.45% |
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMGRX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMGRX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
VMGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.25%, more than LSHAX's 9.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 9.16% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
VMGRX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 17.25% | 17.74% | 1.80% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 34.53% | 6.30% | 10.43% | 14.53% | 3.13% | 0.67% | 8.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMGRX and LSHAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSHAX has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to VMGRX (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGRX dropped -71.74% vs LSHAX's -69.03%.
VMGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMGRX and LSHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer