LSHAX vs. HMDYX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) and HMDYX (The Hartford MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX returned 17.42%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for HMDYX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LSHAX charges 1.68%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HMDYX.

Performance

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHAX achieves a 32.50% return, which is significantly higher than HMDYX's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX has outperformed HMDYX with an annualized return of 17.42%, while HMDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.

LSHAX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: 12.03%
• YTD: 32.50%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: 17.42%
• ALL TIME*: 8.46%

HMDYX

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -5.22%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 1Y: -0.27%
• 3Y*: 3.38%
• 5Y*: -0.84%
• 10Y*: 8.20%
• ALL TIME*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HMDYX The Hartford MidCap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	32.50%	-19.53%	82.16%	-19.74%	39.45%	42.75%	5.23%	31.30%	-8.18%	15.65%
HMDYX The Hartford MidCap Fund	2.83%	-0.48%	6.17%	14.70%	-24.01%	9.89%	25.10%	38.80%	-7.56%	24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHAX and HMDYX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between LSHAX and HMDYX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LSHAX vs. HMDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSHAX

LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

HMDYX

HMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 3
HMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSHAX	HMDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.14	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	-0.06	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.99	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	-0.18	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	-0.51	+1.94

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the HMDYX Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHAX and HMDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHAX drawdown since its inception was -69.03%, which is greater than HMDYX's maximum drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHAX and HMDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSHAX	HMDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.03%	-50.76%	-18.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.39%	-15.91%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.79%	-26.77%	-19.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.79%	-32.92%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.78%	-37.98%	-12.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.49%	-8.22%	-17.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.96%	-8.86%	-13.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.03%	5.64%	+7.39%

Volatility

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) at 6.45%. This indicates that LSHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSHAX	HMDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	6.45%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.05%	16.79%	+13.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.97%	20.41%	+18.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.59%	21.96%	+12.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.98%	21.63%	+9.35%

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHAX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than HMDYX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSHAX vs. HMDYX - Dividend Comparison

LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, less than HMDYX's 18.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMDYX The Hartford MidCap Fund	18.07%	18.58%	4.80%	1.73%	7.40%	10.29%	9.17%	8.60%	11.42%	3.95%	2.61%	7.05%
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	8.75%	11.59%	4.66%	9.40%	1.76%	0.11%	0.53%	0.00%	4.85%	3.94%	1.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSHAX and HMDYX in my portfolio?

LSHAX and HMDYX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSHAX or HMDYX?

LSHAX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to HMDYX (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHAX dropped -69.03% vs HMDYX's -50.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.