VMFVX vs. TRMCX
VMFVX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares) and TRMCX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX returned 10.69%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for TRMCX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VMFVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for TRMCX.
Performance
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than TRMCX's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has underperformed TRMCX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while TRMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.
VMFVX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 22.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
TRMCX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 10.96% | 7.57% | 10.59% | 16.49% | -7.03% | 30.54% | 3.68% | 26.18% | -11.90% | 12.27% |
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 17.90% | 6.16% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMFVX and TRMCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VMFVX and TRMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMFVX vs. TRMCX — Risk / Return Rank
VMFVX
TRMCX
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMFVX | TRMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.28 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 12.42 | -5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum TRMCX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and TRMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMFVX | TRMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -55.28% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -9.41% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -29.60% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.46% | -29.60% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.79% | -39.41% | -6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -6.63% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.48% | +0.56% |
Volatility
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) is 4.23%, while T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that VMFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMFVX | TRMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 4.90% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 11.04% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 14.57% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 19.32% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 19.67% | +2.22% |
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRMCX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMFVX vs. TRMCX - Dividend Comparison
VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than TRMCX's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 4.60% | 5.43% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.81% | 1.58% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 2.48% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 1.42% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VMFVX and TRMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TRMCX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to VMFVX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs TRMCX's -55.28%.
TRMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMFVX and TRMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer