VMFVX vs. NCBVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VMFVX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares) and NCBVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX returned 10.69%/yr vs 8.00%/yr for NCBVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VMFVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for NCBVX.

Performance

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than NCBVX's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has outperformed NCBVX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while NCBVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.

VMFVX

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: 22.11%
• 3Y*: 13.31%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

NCBVX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 17.24%
• 6M: 15.32%
• 1Y: 32.13%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	10.96%	7.57%	10.59%	16.49%	-7.03%	30.54%	3.68%	26.18%	-11.90%	12.27%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	17.24%	11.86%	10.49%	10.40%	-10.18%	33.13%	-7.31%	18.78%	-20.51%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFVX and NCBVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.96

The correlation between VMFVX and NCBVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VMFVX vs. NCBVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMFVX

VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 32
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

NCBVX

NCBVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
NCBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NCBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NCBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NCBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NCBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMFVX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.44	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.46	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	5.14	-3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	18.54	-11.17

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the NCBVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFVX and NCBVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum NCBVX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and NCBVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMFVX	NCBVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.79%	-60.64%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-6.31%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.46%	-21.27%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.46%	-23.15%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.79%	-57.50%	+11.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.69%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-9.09%	+3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	1.75%	+1.29%

Volatility

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMFVX	NCBVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	4.12%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	9.80%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	13.29%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.45%	18.80%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	22.68%	-0.79%

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NCBVX's 1.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMFVX vs. NCBVX - Dividend Comparison

VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than NCBVX's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	0.58%	0.68%	1.03%	1.59%	1.17%	0.74%	1.60%	1.93%	13.70%	6.69%	2.83%	7.89%
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	1.70%	1.88%	1.81%	1.58%	2.04%	1.81%	2.48%	1.94%	2.01%	1.56%	1.42%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMFVX and NCBVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, VMFVX and NCBVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VMFVX or NCBVX?

VMFVX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to NCBVX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs NCBVX's -60.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.