PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMFVX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 29.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.


VMFVX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.00%
6M
9.03%
YTD
13.52%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
10.87%

FSLSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.06%
6M
19.20%
YTD
29.05%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.12%
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
13.52%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
29.05%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFVX and FSLSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.95

The correlation between VMFVX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMFVX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMFVXFSLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.06

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

10.30

-3.47

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFVX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMFVXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-69.87%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-9.79%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-26.81%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-26.81%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.79%

-47.98%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.91%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-8.25%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.94%

+0.02%

Volatility

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) at 3.24%. This indicates that VMFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMFVXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.24%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

11.73%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

18.79%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

20.41%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

21.87%

-0.06%

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMFVX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.66%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VMFVX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FSLSX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FSLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMFVX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer