PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. MNDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. MNDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than MNDO's -10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VMBS has underperformed MNDO with an annualized return of 1.28%, while MNDO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.92% annualized return.


VMBS

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-0.13%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.28%

MNDO

1D
-2.83%
1M
7.56%
6M
-18.25%
YTD
-10.43%
1Y
-30.41%
3Y*
-12.82%
5Y*
-14.30%
10Y*
2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMBS vs. MNDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.28%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
-10.43%-34.77%12.86%4.21%-26.48%30.73%21.80%18.54%-7.49%26.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and MNDO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. MNDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MNDO
MNDO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MNDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMBS vs. MNDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMBSMNDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.87

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.75

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

-1.26

+7.16

VMBS vs. MNDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the MNDO Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and MNDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. MNDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum MNDO drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and MNDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSMNDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-94.28%

+76.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-40.53%

+37.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-54.63%

+47.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-64.04%

+46.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

-64.04%

+46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-57.92%

+56.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-46.76%

+44.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

24.21%

-23.35%

Volatility

VMBS vs. MNDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) is 1.32%, while MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a volatility of 13.76%. This indicates that VMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSMNDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

13.76%

-12.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

28.15%

-24.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

38.85%

-34.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.79%

28.91%

-22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

26.99%

-21.58%

Dividends

VMBS vs. MNDO - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
0.00%19.13%12.15%12.24%12.38%8.37%9.27%10.79%13.16%11.55%10.98%11.86%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.22%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMBS and MNDO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNDO has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to VMBS (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs MNDO's -94.28%.

VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and MNDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer