VMBS vs. MNDO
VMBS (Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) is Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while MNDO (MIND C.T.I. Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VMBS returned 1.36%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for MNDO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
VMBS vs. MNDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than MNDO's -14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VMBS has underperformed MNDO with an annualized return of 1.36%, while MNDO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.21% annualized return.
VMBS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
MNDO
- 1D
- 6.73%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -14.80%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- 1Y
- -33.80%
- 3Y*
- -14.40%
- 5Y*
- -14.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
VMBS vs. MNDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.70% | 8.36% | 1.70% | 5.34% | -11.90% | -1.28% | 3.76% | 6.19% | 0.91% | 2.47% |
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd | -14.80% | -34.77% | 12.86% | 4.21% | -26.48% | 30.73% | 21.80% | 18.54% | -7.49% | 26.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMBS and MNDO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMBS vs. MNDO — Risk / Return Rank
VMBS
MNDO
VMBS vs. MNDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMBS | MNDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.84 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.83 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | -1.51 | +9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMBS | MNDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | -0.92 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.51 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.08 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.04 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
VMBS vs. MNDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum MNDO drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and MNDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMBS | MNDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -94.28% | +76.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -40.93% | +38.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.65% | -54.63% | +46.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -64.04% | +46.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.47% | -64.04% | +46.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -59.97% | +58.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -46.71% | +44.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 22.45% | -21.65% |
Volatility
VMBS vs. MNDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) is 1.61%, while MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a volatility of 18.13%. This indicates that VMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMBS | MNDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 18.13% | -16.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 24.27% | -21.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 36.68% | -32.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 28.32% | -21.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.40% | 26.62% | -21.22% |
Dividends
VMBS vs. MNDO - Dividend Comparison
VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, while MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd | 0.00% | 19.13% | 12.15% | 12.24% | 12.38% | 8.37% | 9.27% | 10.79% | 13.16% | 11.55% | 10.98% | 11.86% |
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 4.18% | 4.20% | 3.94% | 3.31% | 2.35% | 1.02% | 2.01% | 2.77% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 2.10% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMBS and MNDO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNDO has higher volatility (18.13%) compared to VMBS (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs MNDO's -94.28%.
VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMBS and MNDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer