VLUE vs. EWY
VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLUE returned 15.38%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
VLUE vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 45.72% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 15.38%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.
VLUE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 45.72%
- 6M
- 46.53%
- 1Y
- 83.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
VLUE vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.72% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and EWY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between VLUE and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
VLUE vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLUE
EWY
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VLUE
EWY
Financial Services
VLUE
EWY
Healthcare
VLUE
EWY
Communication Services
VLUE
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
VLUE
EWY
Industrials
VLUE
EWY
Consumer Defensive
VLUE
EWY
Energy
VLUE
EWY
Utilities
VLUE
EWY
Real Estate
VLUE
EWY
-
Basic Materials
VLUE
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
EWY
VLUE vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLUE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.59 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.25 | 8.65 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.16 | 30.24 | +8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -74.14% | +34.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -23.08% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -27.36% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | -48.55% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -49.73% | +10.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -8.88% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -20.11% | +14.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 6.59% | -4.46% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is 8.83%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that VLUE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 25.64% | -16.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 42.65% | -27.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 46.51% | -28.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 30.15% | -12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 28.06% | -8.15% |
VLUE vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLUE vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and EWY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to VLUE (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 15.38% for VLUE. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VLUE has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 15.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.59% for EWY.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 4.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer