PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLU vs. IVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLU vs. IVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than IVE's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has outperformed IVE with an annualized return of 14.20%, while IVE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.


VLU

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.59%
YTD
13.07%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
14.20%

IVE

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
7.48%
6M
6.87%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLU vs. IVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
13.07%16.70%17.24%17.18%-8.24%30.95%9.91%26.20%-7.89%18.16%
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
7.48%13.02%12.03%22.07%-5.41%24.72%1.22%31.62%-9.22%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and IVE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.74

The correlation between VLU and IVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VLU vs. IVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLU
IVE

Technology

19.1%
22.4%

Financial Services

18.4%
14.6%

Healthcare

11.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
11.1%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.2%

Industrials

8.3%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
8.9%

Energy

6.6%
7.0%

Utilities

3.5%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.3%

Technology

VLU
19.1%
IVE
22.4%

Financial Services

VLU
18.4%
IVE
14.6%

Healthcare

VLU
11.5%
IVE
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VLU
10.7%
IVE
11.1%

Communication Services

VLU
8.8%
IVE
3.2%

Industrials

VLU
8.3%
IVE
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

VLU
7.1%
IVE
8.9%

Energy

VLU
6.6%
IVE
7.0%

Utilities

VLU
3.5%
IVE
4.3%

Real Estate

VLU
3.4%
IVE
3.4%

Basic Materials

VLU
2.6%
IVE
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLU vs. IVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IVE
IVE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. IVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLUIVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

3.24

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.56

12.29

+5.27

VLU vs. IVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the IVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and IVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLU vs. IVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, smaller than the maximum IVE drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and IVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-61.32%

+23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-6.19%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-17.58%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-18.04%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.39%

-37.04%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.21%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-10.08%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.63%

-0.04%

Volatility

VLU vs. IVE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.96%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

7.33%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

9.93%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

14.39%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

16.93%

+1.13%

VLU vs. IVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IVE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLU vs. IVE - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than IVE's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
1.57%1.61%2.04%1.65%2.10%1.81%2.37%2.11%2.74%2.12%2.26%2.44%
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.64%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VLU and IVE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVE has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to VLU (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs IVE's -61.32%.

On 10-year performance, VLU leads with 14.20% vs 12.03% for IVE. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLU has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVE.

VLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.57% for IVE.

VLU tracks S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.18% for IVE.

VLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLU and IVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer