PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLU vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VLU vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VLU vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
2.50%16.70%17.24%17.18%-2.99%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
-2.26%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -2.26% return.


VLU

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
2.50%
6M
6.27%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
13.18%

CGDV

1D
2.88%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
1.93%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VLU vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VLU vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLUCGDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

1.83

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.01

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.78

8.64

-0.86

VLU vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLUCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.04

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and CGDV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VLU vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than CGDV's 1.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.78%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.34%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VLU vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and CGDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-21.82%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-10.91%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-7.15%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-3.72%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.54%

+0.06%

Volatility

VLU vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 4.31%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VLUCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

5.60%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

9.27%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

16.77%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.62%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

15.62%

+2.47%