VLSMX vs. VCTPX
VLSMX (VALIC Company I Moderate Growth Lifestyle Fund) and VCTPX (VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund) are both mutual funds - VLSMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by VALIC, while VCTPX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by VALIC. Over the past 3 years, VLSMX returned 12.41%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for VCTPX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VLSMX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for VCTPX.
Performance
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLSMX achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than VCTPX's 2.23% return.
VLSMX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCTPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLSMX VALIC Company I Moderate Growth Lifestyle Fund | 6.24% | 11.90% | 10.83% | 13.95% | -14.66% | 3.57% |
VCTPX VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund | 2.23% | 4.22% | 1.15% | 4.03% | -10.23% | 4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLSMX and VCTPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLSMX vs. VCTPX — Risk / Return Rank
VLSMX
VCTPX
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Moderate Growth Lifestyle Fund (VLSMX) and VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund (VCTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLSMX | VCTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | 1.96 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 2.92 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 3.32 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 9.00 | +3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLSMX | VCTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.96 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLSMX drawdown since its inception was -20.09%, which is greater than VCTPX's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLSMX and VCTPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLSMX | VCTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -17.48% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -1.84% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | -5.19% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -5.84% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 0.68% | +0.73% |
Volatility
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Volatility Comparison
VALIC Company I Moderate Growth Lifestyle Fund (VLSMX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund (VCTPX) at 0.88%. This indicates that VLSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLSMX | VCTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 0.88% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.09% | 2.15% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.47% | 3.12% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 5.60% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 4.86% | +5.04% |
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLSMX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VCTPX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLSMX vs. VCTPX - Dividend Comparison
VLSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than VCTPX's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCTPX VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund | 2.56% | 0.00% | 13.97% | 13.35% | 8.00% | 1.86% | 2.20% | 1.63% | 1.98% | 0.39% |
VLSMX VALIC Company I Moderate Growth Lifestyle Fund | 6.03% | 0.00% | 2.12% | 11.91% | 9.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLSMX and VCTPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLSMX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to VCTPX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLSMX dropped -20.09% vs VCTPX's -17.48%.
VLSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLSMX and VCTPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer