PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLO vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VLO vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VLO

1D
-1.17%
1M
6.63%
YTD
58.86%
6M
48.51%
1Y
104.41%
3Y*
36.67%
5Y*
29.38%
10Y*
21.00%

K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLO vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
58.86%36.97%-2.96%5.86%74.95%40.25%-35.69%30.27%-15.73%38.66%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VLO and K is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VLO:

$76.23B

K:

$29.20B

EPS

VLO:

$13.77

K:

$3.65

PE Ratio

VLO:

18.58

K:

22.87

PEG Ratio

VLO:

0.07

K:

3.84

PS Ratio

VLO:

0.62

K:

2.30

PB Ratio

VLO:

2.83

K:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

VLO:

$126.17B

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VLO:

$12.45B

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

VLO:

$9.02B

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLO vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLO
VLO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

K
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLO vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.85

VLO vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Drawdowns

VLO vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

Volatility

VLO vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.39%

Dividends

VLO vs. K - Dividend Comparison

VLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than K's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
1.82%2.78%3.49%3.14%3.09%5.22%6.93%3.84%4.27%2.34%3.51%2.40%

Financials

VLO vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Valero Energy Corporation and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
32.38B
3.26B
(VLO) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VLO vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Valero Energy Corporation and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
33.3%
Portfolio components
VLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.20B and revenue of 32.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

VLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.73B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

VLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VLO and K have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLO and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer