PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLAAX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.57% return.


VLAAX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.94%
YTD
-4.38%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
-10.49%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
7.23%

FSRKX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.57%
6M
9.33%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VLAAX
Value Line Asset Allocation Fund
-4.38%-2.61%9.36%21.52%-15.70%11.77%15.24%3.46%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.57%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VLAAX and FSRKX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLAAX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLAAX
VLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
VLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLAAXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.19

3.67

-4.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.57

5.19

-6.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.74

-0.92

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

8.94

-9.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

33.72

-35.02

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLAAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLAAX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLAAXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.19

3.67

-4.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.93

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.93

-0.32

Drawdowns

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLAAXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-19.93%

-24.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-1.93%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-5.84%

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-12.74%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.41%

-0.93%

-16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-3.21%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

0.51%

+7.24%

Volatility

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.31%. This indicates that VLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLAAXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.31%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

3.68%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.90%

4.72%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

6.94%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.92%

7.80%

+5.12%

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLAAX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than FSRKX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.26%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLAAX
Value Line Asset Allocation Fund
12.78%12.22%10.14%9.88%6.00%6.43%0.53%1.74%3.09%4.34%2.38%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLAAX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLAAX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FSRKX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLAAX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer