VLAAX vs. FIQCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

VLAAX (Value Line Asset Allocation Fund) and FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, VLAAX returned 1.77%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for FIQCX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VLAAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FIQCX.

Performance

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than FIQCX's 12.29% return.

VLAAX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: -2.34%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 1Y: -9.23%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: 1.77%
• 10Y*: 7.04%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

FIQCX

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 8.42%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	-3.92%	-2.61%	9.36%	21.52%	-15.70%	11.77%	15.24%	25.40%	-4.71%
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	12.29%	20.94%	12.67%	19.15%	-18.53%	17.26%	19.45%	26.32%	-9.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VLAAX and FIQCX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and FIQCX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VLAAX vs. FIQCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VLAAX

VLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 0
VLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FIQCX

FIQCX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIQCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FIQCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FIQCX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FIQCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FIQCX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VLAAX	FIQCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	1.65	-2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.43	2.32	-3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.30	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	2.42	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	10.22	-11.39

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLAAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the FIQCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLAAX and FIQCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than FIQCX's maximum drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and FIQCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLAAX	FIQCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-30.97%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.99%	-9.34%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-15.35%	-4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.26%	-25.94%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.01%	-1.78%	-15.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-5.40%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.65%	2.21%	+6.44%

Volatility

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) is 3.41%, while Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that VLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLAAX	FIQCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	3.93%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	11.54%	-4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	13.67%	-4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.71%	14.85%	-1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.93%	16.67%	-3.74%

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQCX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

VLAAX vs. FIQCX - Dividend Comparison

VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than FIQCX's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	5.11%	5.74%	3.61%	1.43%	5.21%	3.30%	2.07%	5.66%	5.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	12.72%	12.22%	10.14%	9.88%	6.00%	6.43%	0.53%	1.74%	3.09%	4.34%	2.38%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLAAX and FIQCX in my portfolio?

VLAAX and FIQCX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLAAX or FIQCX?

FIQCX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to VLAAX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs FIQCX's -30.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.