VLAAX vs. AYBLX
VLAAX (Value Line Asset Allocation Fund) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX returned 7.10%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLAAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.59% annualized return.
VLAAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- -10.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
AYBLX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | -5.80% | -2.61% | 9.36% | 21.52% | -15.70% | 11.77% | 15.24% | 25.40% | 2.00% | 14.94% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 14.22% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLAAX and AYBLX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and AYBLX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLAAX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
VLAAX
AYBLX
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLAAX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.61 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 5.12 | -5.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 23.78 | -25.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than AYBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLAAX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -36.28% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -6.41% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -13.39% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -20.26% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.89% | -24.24% | +0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.63% | -0.32% | -18.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -3.78% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.21% | 1.38% | +6.83% |
Volatility
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) is 2.49%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that VLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLAAX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 3.74% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 7.86% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.04% | 9.94% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 11.13% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 11.33% | +1.59% |
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLAAX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | 12.98% | 12.22% | 10.14% | 9.88% | 6.00% | 6.43% | 0.53% | 1.74% | 3.09% | 4.34% | 2.38% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLAAX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AYBLX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VLAAX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLAAX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer