VKMMX vs. GSMIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VKMMX (Invesco Municipal Income Fund) and GSMIX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, VKMMX returned 2.09%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GSMIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VKMMX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for GSMIX.

Performance

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Municipal Income Fund (VKMMX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VKMMX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than GSMIX's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VKMMX has underperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.50% annualized return.

VKMMX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: 2.09%

GSMIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: 1.04%
• 10Y*: 2.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VKMMX Invesco Municipal Income Fund	2.29%	3.03%	3.01%	6.50%	-12.49%	3.63%	4.66%	8.67%	0.24%	6.33%
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund	1.66%	4.12%	3.03%	6.41%	-9.77%	2.80%	3.57%	7.49%	2.83%	5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VKMMX and GSMIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994	0.85

The correlation between VKMMX and GSMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VKMMX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VKMMX

VKMMX Risk / Return Rank: 52
VKMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VKMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VKMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VKMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VKMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GSMIX

GSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
GSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Municipal Income Fund (VKMMX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VKMMX	GSMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.65	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	4.29	-1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.64	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	2.56	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.94	8.71	-0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VKMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the GSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VKMMX and GSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VKMMX	GSMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	2.65	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.28	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.64	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.96	+0.08

Drawdowns

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VKMMX drawdown since its inception was -21.20%, which is greater than GSMIX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VKMMX and GSMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VKMMX	GSMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-15.43%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-2.46%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.99%	-5.37%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.97%	-14.33%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.97%	-14.33%	-3.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.28%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-2.40%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.72%	+0.19%

Volatility

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Municipal Income Fund (VKMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) at 0.86%. This indicates that VKMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VKMMX	GSMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	0.86%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	1.78%	+0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	2.38%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.97%	3.67%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.80%	3.92%	+0.88%

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VKMMX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

VKMMX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison

VKMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than GSMIX's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund	3.49%	4.32%	3.31%	2.82%	1.86%	1.92%	2.11%	2.57%	2.79%	2.99%	3.35%	3.43%
VKMMX Invesco Municipal Income Fund	4.05%	5.16%	4.06%	3.12%	3.42%	3.05%	2.86%	3.80%	4.07%	3.62%	4.14%	4.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VKMMX and GSMIX in my portfolio?

VKMMX and GSMIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VKMMX or GSMIX?

VKMMX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to GSMIX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VKMMX dropped -21.20% vs GSMIX's -15.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.