PortfoliosLab logo
GSMIX vs. FMBIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GSMIX and FMBIX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSMIX:

0.45

FMBIX:

1.11

Sortino Ratio

GSMIX:

0.52

FMBIX:

1.67

Omega Ratio

GSMIX:

1.09

FMBIX:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

GSMIX:

0.37

FMBIX:

0.65

Martin Ratio

GSMIX:

1.28

FMBIX:

3.53

Ulcer Index

GSMIX:

1.43%

FMBIX:

1.22%

Daily Std Dev

GSMIX:

4.85%

FMBIX:

3.56%

Max Drawdown

GSMIX:

-15.43%

FMBIX:

-14.31%

Current Drawdown

GSMIX:

-2.61%

FMBIX:

-2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMIX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FMBIX's 0.59% return.


GSMIX

YTD

-1.26%

1M

0.36%

6M

-1.80%

1Y

2.16%

3Y*

2.22%

5Y*

1.71%

10Y*

2.36%

FMBIX

YTD

0.59%

1M

0.00%

6M

-0.29%

1Y

4.31%

3Y*

2.04%

5Y*

0.50%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSMIX vs. FMBIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSMIX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSMIX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSMIX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSMIX is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSMIX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSMIX is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FMBIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMBIX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMBIX is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMBIX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMBIX is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMBIX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMBIX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FMBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMIX and FMBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison

GSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than FMBIX's 2.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
3.40%3.31%3.09%2.49%1.92%2.11%2.39%2.79%3.00%3.36%3.43%3.54%
FMBIX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund
2.47%2.59%2.31%1.80%1.42%1.59%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMIX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, which is greater than FMBIX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMIX and FMBIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GSMIX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...