PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITL vs. SPOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VITL vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -68.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPOT's -13.36% return.


VITL

1D
0.20%
1M
12.53%
YTD
-68.50%
6M
-68.29%
1Y
-67.42%
3Y*
-10.77%
5Y*
-15.28%
10Y*

SPOT

1D
1.24%
1M
20.42%
YTD
-13.36%
6M
-12.09%
1Y
-29.36%
3Y*
49.53%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITL vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
-68.50%-15.26%140.22%5.16%-17.39%-28.64%-28.22%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
-13.36%29.80%138.08%138.01%-66.27%-25.62%22.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VITL and SPOT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.20

The correlation between VITL and SPOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VITL:

$448.55M

SPOT:

$105.30B

EPS

VITL:

$1.05

SPOT:

$12.94

PE Ratio

VITL:

9.60

SPOT:

38.89

PEG Ratio

VITL:

0.02

SPOT:

0.43

PS Ratio

VITL:

0.59

SPOT:

6.01

PB Ratio

VITL:

1.36

SPOT:

13.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

VITL:

$784.41M

SPOT:

$17.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VITL:

$276.18M

SPOT:

$5.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

VITL:

$82.41M

SPOT:

$2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITL vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITL
VITL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOT
SPOT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITL vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VITLSPOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.90

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.63

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-1.10

-0.33

VITL vs. SPOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITL Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the SPOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITL and SPOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VITLSPOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

-0.65

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.34

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.34

-0.70

Drawdowns

VITL vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SPOT drawdown of -80.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and SPOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITLSPOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.20%

-80.51%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.20%

-46.80%

-37.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.20%

-46.80%

-37.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.20%

-76.39%

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.81%

-35.16%

-45.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.28%

-30.81%

-16.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.12%

26.76%

+20.36%

Volatility

VITL vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison

Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) at 15.97%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITLSPOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.45%

15.97%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.11%

37.40%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.49%

45.30%

+16.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.16%

47.60%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.74%

47.26%

+6.48%

Dividends

VITL vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither VITL nor SPOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

VITL vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Farms, Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
187.16M
4.61B
(VITL) Total Revenue
(SPOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VITL vs. SPOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vital Farms, Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
28.3%
32.9%
Portfolio components
VITL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

SPOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

VITL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

SPOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 726.76M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

VITL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.

SPOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 732.86M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VITL and SPOT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to SPOT (15.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs SPOT's -80.51%.

SPOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITL and SPOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer