VITL vs. MSFT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. VITL operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -15.28%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VITL vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -68.50% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -14.48% return.

VITL

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 12.53%
• YTD: -68.50%
• 6M: -68.29%
• 1Y: -67.42%
• 3Y*: -10.77%
• 5Y*: -15.28%
• 10Y*: —

MSFT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 6M: -15.77%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 24.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITL vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	-68.50%	-15.26%	140.22%	5.16%	-17.39%	-28.64%	-28.22%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-14.48%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VITL and MSFT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020	0.17

The correlation between VITL and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VITL : $448.55M MSFT : $3.07T
EPS VITL : $1.05 MSFT : $16.79
PE Ratio VITL : 9.60 MSFT : 24.52
PEG Ratio VITL : 0.02 MSFT : 1.72
PS Ratio VITL : 0.59 MSFT : 9.65
PB Ratio VITL : 1.36 MSFT : 7.40
Total Revenue (TTM) VITL : $784.41M MSFT : $318.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) VITL : $276.18M MSFT : $217.41B
EBITDA (TTM) VITL : $82.41M MSFT : $200.96B

Return for Risk

VITL vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITL

VITL Risk / Return Rank: 5
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITL vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VITL	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	-0.47	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.06	-0.49	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	0.94	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.35	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	-0.73	-0.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VITL vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITL Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITL and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VITL	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	-0.47	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.42	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.74	-1.10

Drawdowns

VITL vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VITL	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.20%	-69.38%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.20%	-33.91%	-50.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.20%	-33.91%	-50.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.20%	-37.15%	-47.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.81%	-23.56%	-57.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.28%	-21.78%	-25.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.12%	16.13%	+30.99%

Volatility

VITL vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.25%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VITL	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.45%	10.25%	+8.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.11%	22.36%	+25.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.49%	25.31%	+36.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.16%	26.64%	+27.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.74%	27.06%	+26.68%

Dividends

VITL vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.86%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

VITL vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vital Farms, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VITL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

VITL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

VITL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VITL and MSFT in my portfolio?

VITL and MSFT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VITL or MSFT?

VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.