VITL vs. EMXC
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -14.55%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -69.10% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 41.72% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -24.08%
- YTD
- -69.10%
- 6M
- -67.66%
- 1Y
- -68.47%
- 3Y*
- -12.45%
- 5Y*
- -14.55%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 41.72%
- 6M
- 46.94%
- 1Y
- 77.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
VITL vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -69.10% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -28.22% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 41.72% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 24.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and EMXC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between VITL and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
EMXC
VITL vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.64 | -0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 5.44 | -6.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 21.99 | -23.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | 3.61 | -4.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.74 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.55 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
VITL vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -42.81% | -41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -14.41% | -69.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -19.12% | -65.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -28.91% | -55.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.17% | -1.00% | -80.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -10.19% | -37.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.28% | 3.56% | +42.72% |
Volatility
VITL vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 30.14% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 9.88%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.14% | 9.88% | +20.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.39% | 19.34% | +29.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.36% | 21.70% | +39.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.20% | 17.45% | +36.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.78% | 19.82% | +33.96% |
Dividends
VITL vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.99% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and EMXC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (30.14%) compared to EMXC (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer