VITL vs. EMXC
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -7.25%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -58.74% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 28.41% return.
VITL
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 23.18%
- 6M
- -55.31%
- YTD
- -58.74%
- 1Y
- -64.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- YTD
- 28.41%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- —
VITL vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -58.74% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 28.41% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 23.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and EMXC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between VITL and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
EMXC
VITL vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.35 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 3.42 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 11.45 | -12.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VITL vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -42.81% | -41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -14.41% | -69.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -19.12% | -65.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -28.91% | -55.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.85% | -12.87% | -61.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.78% | -10.14% | -37.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.31% | 4.29% | +49.02% |
Volatility
VITL vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 16.31% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 11.85%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.31% | 11.85% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.03% | 24.92% | +25.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.01% | 26.57% | +36.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.53% | 18.77% | +35.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.77% | 20.38% | +33.39% |
Dividends
VITL vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.07% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and EMXC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.31%) compared to EMXC (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer