PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VISTX vs. FCFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VISTX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VISTX has underperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.20% annualized return.


VISTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
2.45%

FCFAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
0.81%5.68%5.56%4.98%-3.73%-0.04%3.92%4.20%1.83%1.42%
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.36%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VISTX and FCFAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.52

The correlation between VISTX and FCFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VISTX vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VISTX
VISTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VISTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VISTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VISTXFCFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.45

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

2.76

+2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.80

10.33

+10.47

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VISTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VISTX and FCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VISTXFCFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.23

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.67

1.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

1.45

+0.26

Drawdowns

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VISTX drawdown since its inception was -5.64%, smaller than the maximum FCFAX drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VISTX and FCFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISTXFCFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-16.33%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.86%

-1.82%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.86%

-2.82%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.64%

-10.49%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.64%

-16.33%

+10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.11%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-1.53%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.48%

-0.27%

Volatility

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX) is 0.39%, while Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that VISTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISTXFCFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

0.78%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

1.72%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32%

2.25%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.87%

2.76%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.47%

3.24%

-1.77%

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VISTX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

VISTX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

VISTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than FCFAX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.16%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
4.46%4.53%5.03%3.91%1.76%1.85%2.33%2.72%2.32%1.78%1.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VISTX and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFAX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to VISTX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VISTX dropped -5.64% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.

VISTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VISTX and FCFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer