VIRT vs. DBMF
VIRT (Virtu Financial, Inc.) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, VIRT returned 14.00%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for DBMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
VIRT vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIRT achieves a 54.02% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 12.42% return.
VIRT
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 54.02%
- 6M
- 47.09%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VIRT vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 54.02% | -4.24% | 83.03% | 4.61% | -26.51% | 18.58% | 64.42% | -31.78% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.42% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIRT and DBMF is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIRT vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
VIRT
DBMF
VIRT vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIRT | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.55 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 5.17 | -4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 19.07 | -17.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIRT | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.59 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.77 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
VIRT vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIRT drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIRT and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIRT | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.17% | -20.39% | -35.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.83% | -6.10% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -15.60% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.52% | -20.39% | -34.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | 0.00% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -6.59% | -19.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.06% | 1.65% | +13.41% |
Volatility
VIRT vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.12%. This indicates that VIRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIRT | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 2.12% | +8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 9.76% | +14.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.67% | 12.17% | +17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.36% | 12.52% | +19.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 12.41% | +23.35% |
Dividends
VIRT vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
VIRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than DBMF's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.09% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 1.89% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 4.74% | 4.70% | 3.33% | 3.81% | 6.00% | 3.73% | 5.25% | 6.02% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIRT and DBMF have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIRT has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to DBMF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIRT dropped -56.17% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIRT and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer