PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIRP.PA achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than STMPA.PA's 205.97% return. Over the past 10 years, VIRP.PA has underperformed STMPA.PA with an annualized return of 7.60%, while STMPA.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 30.37% annualized return.


VIRP.PA

1D
-1.16%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-4.35%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
7.60%

STMPA.PA

1D
0.31%
1M
45.71%
YTD
205.97%
6M
222.84%
1Y
208.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
30.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIRP.PA
Virbac SA
-4.62%13.46%-11.63%58.43%-46.10%78.84%0.63%107.82%-7.85%-26.14%
STMPA.PA
STMicroelectronics N.V.
205.97%-6.47%-45.87%37.73%-23.50%43.89%27.10%94.08%-30.69%70.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 1994

0.15

The correlation between VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIRP.PA
VIRP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VIRP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIRP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIRP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VIRP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIRP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

STMPA.PA
STMPA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STMPA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIRP.PASTMPA.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

4.10

-3.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

4.08

-3.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.61

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

6.09

-5.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.48

13.28

-12.81

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIRP.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the STMPA.PA Sharpe Ratio of 4.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIRP.PASTMPA.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

4.10

-3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.46

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.74

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.27

+0.10

Drawdowns

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIRP.PA drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum STMPA.PA drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIRP.PASTMPA.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-95.75%

+36.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-33.59%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-66.46%

+36.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.27%

-66.46%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-66.46%

+16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.73%

0.00%

-21.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-59.07%

+38.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

15.50%

-8.90%

Volatility

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) is 7.23%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA) has a volatility of 20.71%. This indicates that VIRP.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STMPA.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIRP.PASTMPA.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

20.71%

-13.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

36.25%

-19.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.34%

50.05%

-24.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.32%

39.68%

-7.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.05%

40.16%

-4.11%

Dividends

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Dividend Comparison

VIRP.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than STMPA.PA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STMPA.PA
STMicroelectronics N.V.
0.39%1.20%1.08%0.42%0.60%0.38%0.46%0.77%1.41%1.00%2.02%5.01%
VIRP.PA
Virbac SA
0.43%0.41%0.42%0.37%0.55%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.86%

Financials

VIRP.PA vs. STMPA.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Virbac SA and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIRP.PA and STMPA.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer