VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VIRP.PA (Virbac SA) is a stock, while AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Over the past 10 years, VIRP.PA returned 7.60%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for AASG.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VIRP.PA is traded in EUR, while AASG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AASG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIRP.PA achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than AASG.L's 34.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VIRP.PA has underperformed AASG.L with an annualized return of 7.60%, while AASG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.

VIRP.PA

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -5.93%
• YTD: -4.62%
• 6M: -4.35%
• 1Y: 3.17%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 13.09%
• YTD: 34.17%
• 6M: 37.31%
• 1Y: 59.77%
• 3Y*: 23.33%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 11.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VIRP.PA Virbac SA	-4.62%	13.46%	-11.63%	58.43%	-46.10%	78.84%	0.63%	107.82%	-7.85%	-26.14%
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	34.17%	17.37%	19.54%	2.83%	-16.07%	1.71%	17.30%	21.56%	-12.09%	25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VIRP.PA and AASG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.20

The correlation between VIRP.PA and AASG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIRP.PA

VIRP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 43
VIRP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VIRP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VIRP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VIRP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
VIRP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VIRP.PA	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	3.13	-3.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	4.09	-3.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.55	-0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	5.04	-4.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	18.25	-17.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIRP.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the AASG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIRP.PA and AASG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VIRP.PA	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	3.13	-3.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.51	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.61	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.62	-0.26

Drawdowns

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIRP.PA drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than AASG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIRP.PA and AASG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VIRP.PA	AASG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-33.32%	-25.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-11.79%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.85%	-19.21%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.27%	-28.81%	-21.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	-33.32%	-16.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.73%	-1.01%	-20.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.15%	-10.27%	-9.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.60%	3.26%	+3.34%

Volatility

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virbac SA (VIRP.PA) is 7.23%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that VIRP.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AASG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VIRP.PA	AASG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	8.36%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.95%	15.77%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.34%	19.03%	+6.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.32%	18.20%	+14.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.05%	18.92%	+17.13%

Dividends

VIRP.PA vs. AASG.L - Dividend Comparison

VIRP.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while AASG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VIRP.PA Virbac SA	0.43%	0.41%	0.42%	0.37%	0.55%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VIRP.PA and AASG.L in my portfolio?

VIRP.PA and AASG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.