PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STMPA.PA vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

STMPA.PA is traded in EUR, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STMPA.PA achieves a 205.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, STMPA.PA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 30.37%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.08% annualized return.


STMPA.PA

1D
0.31%
1M
45.71%
YTD
205.97%
6M
222.84%
1Y
208.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
30.37%

NVDA

1D
0.00%
1M
12.87%
YTD
20.70%
6M
24.55%
1Y
54.41%
3Y*
73.50%
5Y*
67.78%
10Y*
69.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STMPA.PA
STMicroelectronics N.V.
205.97%-6.47%-45.87%37.73%-23.50%43.89%27.10%94.08%-30.69%70.97%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
16.53%22.43%189.15%228.85%-47.18%142.35%103.97%80.94%-27.57%59.62%

Correlation

The correlation between STMPA.PA and NVDA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.33

The correlation between STMPA.PA and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STMPA.PA
STMPA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STMPA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMPA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STMPA.PANVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.27

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.09

2.77

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

6.11

+7.17

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STMPA.PA Sharpe Ratio is 4.10, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STMPA.PA and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STMPA.PANVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10

1.57

+2.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

1.34

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.39

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.75

-0.49

Drawdowns

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STMPA.PA drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STMPA.PA and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMPA.PANVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.75%

-82.97%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.59%

-19.76%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.46%

-41.46%

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.46%

-60.91%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.46%

-60.91%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.13%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.07%

-31.85%

-27.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

8.93%

+6.57%

Volatility

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA.PA) has a higher volatility of 20.71% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.63%. This indicates that STMPA.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMPA.PANVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.71%

11.63%

+9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.25%

25.15%

+11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.05%

34.86%

+15.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.68%

51.09%

-11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.16%

49.89%

-9.73%

Dividends

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

STMPA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
STMPA.PA
STMicroelectronics N.V.
0.39%1.20%1.08%0.42%0.60%0.38%0.46%0.77%1.41%1.00%2.02%5.01%

Financials

STMPA.PA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. STMPA.PA values in EUR, NVDA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


STMPA.PA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STMPA.PA and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer